Julius Caesar Seminar Questions

Julius Caesar Seminar Questions 1. When Caesar says that Cassius thinks too much, I agree. Cassius tends to look into the details and over think simple situations. He becomes really meticulous around how the group of the conspirators is organized. Also, while Cassius is the unrivalled who in the first place comes up with the idea of the conspiracy and that he fates Brutus to be in thrill, he thinks with the plan, yet does not want to take responsibility. Cassius just about argues with himself, collect adapted to too humanityy thoughts running through his mind. He thinks about so vile a thing as Caesar But, O grief, where hast thou light-emitting diode me?I perhaps speak this before a willing bondman. past I admit my answer must be made. But I am armed and dangers to me indifferent, (1. 3. 11-115), proving that his thoughts are all over the place. 2. Brutus does not want the conspirators to swear an oath of allegiance because he feels that it is bad to think that or our cau se or our performance did need an oath when forevery expend of blood that every Roman bears, and nobly bears is guilty, (2. 1. 136-139). Brutus obviously feels that if their intentions and motivations to carrying out the character assassination of Caesar, they do not need an oath.An oath causes people to energize unavailing because they begin to lean on the idea that, no matter what happens. 3. Caesars response to Calphurnias fears adds credence to Brutus and Cassius fears about Caesar because he does not respect warnings. This response might add to the pattern Caesar might follow when other(a)(a) senators bring up new ideas. This can be very unspoilt for others that want to have well-nighwhat of a say when it comes to their opinion on a serious matter. Calpurnia notes that his wisdom is consumed in confidence, (2. 2. 49), showing that Caesar has the idea that what he thinks is what is to happen, without any other opinion. 4.The significance of Caesars north star lecturin g at the Capitol is that Caesar establishes his ideals around his role in power. Caesar frames his arrogance and stubborn temperament by stating there is no fellow in the firmament, (3. 1. 62). In his eyes, he walks on water to all of those that are his supporters and followers. Caesar is overly confident, providing reason to the motivations of the conspirators in their quest to assassinate Caesar. 5. The third plebeians cry of permit him be Caesar, (3. 2. 52) is ironic because, while the people do not know of the truth macrocosm the conspiracy, the goal was to take out Caesar, not switch over him. time their quest seems successful, the true hardships have yet to begin. 6. In the tactic, Shakespeare portrays the public man as almost incoherent. The people constantly seem to be slowly swayed by the words of each and every important character. Also, all of the parking area people are followers. Not one stands up to the authoriseds. At one moment, they are saying, This Caesar was a tyrant, (3. 2. 74) and the next they say that they must tear him to pieces Hes a conspirator, (3. 3. 29), now angered with the retaliation against Caesar. 7. Shakespeare portrays the noblemen in the play as gallant but also cowards. mend they follow through with what they originally decide to believe in, in the end, they are left questioning their motives. While I commend them for following through with their original endeavors, they begin to get rather brutal. An example is when Antony creates a hit list and says that, these many, then, shall die their label are pricked, (4. 1. 1-2). The noblemen want to be noble and celebrateable, yet they go to such(prenominal) brutal extremes. 8. The idea that Brutus never gives in to Cassius shows a little second gear of stubbornness, but it also shows determination. Brutus feels that he knows what is best for the conspirators.The difference between the ship canal Brutus is resilient and that of Cassius is how firm Brutus is. He makes his point, but shows its advantages to different members. He shows benignity when he says that when every drop of blood every Roman bears, and nobly bears, is guilty of a several bastardy if he do prisonbreak the smallest particle of any promise that hath passed from him, (2. 1. 134-140). Brutus is saying that an oath would be pinched because if a man were held responsible for every promise he ever broke, the consequences would be endless. 9. Calpurnia and Portia both seem like protective and honorable wives.Calpurnia is more(prenominal) concentrate on her husband taking his warnings seriously. She is not focused on the details of everything that happens, but is focused on the main idea that Caesars, her husband, smell is in danger. Portia, on the other hand, is more focused on what Brutus is doing. She wants to be informed of the action rather than simply protecting her husband from what is happening, whether she as an explanation or not. She is angered that, at the moment, a pparently, within the bond of joinit is expected I should know no secrets that appertain to you Brutus, (2. 1. 280-282). She feels wronged by this.Portia is determined by facts and information, while Calpurnia is driven by intuition and her feelings. 10. Cassius tells Brutus that if he himself fears the run of Caesar, that he, Brutus, must stop it. Cassius provides Brutus with logical and emotional factors for reasons as to why Brutus should authorise the conspiracy. Cassius informs Brutus that, There was a Brutus once that would have brooked th eternal demon to keep his state in Rome as easily as a king, (1. 2. 159-160). Cassius makes the point that Brutus would never let Rome fall by the hands of Caesar. Cassius is basically telling Brutus what to think and what to feel.While this is cleverly manipulative of Cassius, it shows that Brutus has some mental weakness due to the fact that he is even able to be subject to mind games. 11. Brutus and Cassius are both leaders. While Br utus takes charge and responsibility of the conspiracy, Cassius is the one who took responsibility of persuading Brutus to join in and become the leader. While this shows a manipulative side of Cassius, Brutus has the same. He manages to convince all of the conspirators that an official oath is not necessary, when, in reality, it is often used as a consecrate promise to follow through with a plan.In my mind, a sacred oath would have been somewhat important to the success of the plan, but, as Brutus points out, what other oath than honesty to honesty engaged that this shall be, (2. 1. 126-128). In Brutus mind, honesty and honor is all that is needed in a group decision to decease with the assassination of Caesar. Cassius strongly disagrees, but, while both men have contradictory ideas, their core values are quite similar, showing in their pact to create the conspiracy. 12. Cassius wants to create the conspiracy for more personal reasoning.Cassius, speaking about Caesar, notes that this man is now become a god, and Cassius is a wretched beast and must bend his body, (1. 2. 115-117). From this, one can tell that Cassius is more focused on his personal aspirations to be free of Caesars grip on politics. Brutus, on the other hand, is more focused on the well being of the people of Rome. He wants them to have a fair, focused, and just ruler. While Brutus and Cassius motives for enable the conspiracy could not be more different, the men find common ground on which they agree to attempt a successful assassination of Caesar.