Public Police and Private Security

The frequent police force industry has never had a close relationship with the secret bail department profession. reality police officers prevail typic twoy viewed insular security as law enforcement wanna-bes (p. 247, Clifford, 2004). Private security is viewed this way because the training requirements ar distinguishable and in some ways less extensive than what is required of ordinary police officers (Australian Institute of Criminology, 1998). This has been a controversial issue in the knightly just now in recent historic period has been changing for the better.Private and worldly concern security agencies yield begun to bridge the gaps between the 2 industries. Private security superiors have been effrontery a bad reputation in the past because of the galore(postnominal) abuses of power and the misunderstandings of the main goals of private security. Take for example, Allan Pinkerton started his own security sozz guide in the 1800s and was non very well wantd by many for the program he devised to protect railroad companies from internal threats (Clifford, 2004). Many peck thought he and his company were come out of the closet to number them which brought about ostracize feelings toward him.This very same feeling that security companies are out to get people is still alive today and some security professionals are even less admirationed today. Many people view private security in a negative light because they believe them to be minimum wage help and uneducated. This feeling toward private security has led to stereotypes in which they are called Rent-a-Cops and other derogatory names. Currently, many individuals are on the job(p) to change the negative image that is associated with private security.Police officers also have been given a bad reputation because of the actions of some people who have been on the job in the past. Many law suits and uprisings have been a result of the Ameri backside peoples inability to trust and their dislike of police officers. However, like the security industry, they too, are working to make the industry more professional and regain the trust of the people. There has been an increase in the training as well as the policies and procedure which police officers must follow sequence performing their duties in order to protect the communities and the constitutional rights of each individual.The two industries have do few attempts to integrate in the past but this fact is changing (Gunter &038 Kidwell, 2004). There has been a shift toward increasing public and private security cooperation and abilities to work together in recent years which has been increasing the level of safety that some(prenominal) industries have been able to win. The private security industry has almost unlimited funding has made visible(prenominal) resources for new technology which it has begun to share with law enforcement to increase the efficiency of both operations.One example is Bank of Ameri ca and their security professionals working with giving medication agencies to provide information and resources regarding identity theft including strategies and training to detect and prevent this offense from happening (White, 2008). Another example, Target has built its own nuisance labs in an effort to thwart crime against their company which have also made available to local police agencies to aid in the investigation of crime (International Association of Chiefs of Police, 2012).These cooperative efforts are helping to prevent crime as well as bringing the two industries together for a harsh goal. Public and private policing agencies, however, have different objectives and liabilities in mind with respect to their duties (Li, 2009). Public policing has the safety and security of the public and property in an complete jurisdiction in mind (Li, 2009). They are not focused on just one property in general but all properties and individuals in that particular jurisdiction.Priv ate security on the other hand, is only pertain with the property or area they contracted to protect. The often look out for the interests of the people or businesses that employ them and must remain profitable businesses themselves (Clifford, 2004). Public police are employed by the government and must keep on the governance and funding is done with tax profitser money. They have many restrictions which have been derived from the Constitution and they must strictly adhere to the document (Clifford, 2004).Private security companies are not governed by the constitution and are afforded more freedoms when it comes to their policies and procedures (Clifford, 2004). Also, the personnel who employed by the private security industry are not nearly as liable for their actions as public police officers. Public police officers can actually be sued directly for violations of an individuals constitutional rights. These differences and others have been the differences that have divided the p ublic and private security industry for years. A good cooperative relationship is what the public and private security industry needs.I believe this may begin to be achieved by more government regulation on private security companies as far as employee training and education. Many private security firms do not pay their employees well, they do not train them well, and they hire low class individuals. This must stop if the two industries will ever fully be cooperative. Likewise, public policing agencies must work toward involving private security companies in the safety of the fellowship on a regular basis. More interaction between both industries will help develop a relationship of mutual respect between officers and agencies.